Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Texas seeks to limit women's rights

Texas seeks to limit women's rights

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}
Letters to the Editor

The Texas Legislature is in the midst of an unprecedented assault on trans Americans, having introduced numerous bills aimed at transgender men, women and youth that deny them care and the right to live fully in their chosen genders.

While the bills undoubtedly restrict trans boys and men to narrow ideas of masculinity, their effect on trans women should be seen as part of the Legislature’s broader assault on allwomen. Defenders of SB3 — which restricts trans women and girls participation in sports — say their goal is to protect women and to "save" women’s sports.

How does a bill that reinforces the same old ideas about natural selection by privileging men as a superior category of human through restriction of women’s rights and self-expression, accomplish protection?

This year the Olympics denied cisgender athlete Caster Semenya participation because of rules governing testosterone levels in women athletes. She was protected right out of competition.

By this logic, we would have to see the lack of equal pay for women as a form of protection. The limits placed on medical coverage for women by companies that claim religious exemption would have to be understood as protection, so too would an abortion law that compromises women’s health by denying them care outright.

The anti-transgender bills in Texas together with the abortion bill entrench the second-class status of women and ensure that generations of women to come have fewer rights.

These bills split women’s identity into composite parts that then can be managed under the law. SB29, SB3, SB8 and others are not about protection or fairness, but are attempts to legalize women’s inequality and to substitute discriminatory policies for broad-based rights in direct contravention of the principles on which this country was founded.

These bills save and protect nothing but women’s subordination.

SHONA JACKSON

Bryan

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Keith Arnold (Eagle, Oct. 7) says progressives want everyone to “pay their fair share” of taxes but they never say what amounts to a fair share.

The residents of College Station are very fortunate to have two highly qualified individuals running in next month's election for city council.

I want to thank Blanche Brick for her recent piece on remembering history: it engendered several vigorous replies that I found thought-provoking.

Dedication, the dictionary states, the quality of being dedicated or committed to a task or purpose. Isn’t that what you want from our candida…

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News

Weekend Things to Do

News Alert